The Pitch
There is no doubt that sales is about communicating, and as such sales is very much about semantics. For most people when they hear the word pitch they either think of baseball or sales. Not wanting to get nasty notes, yes some in the UK may also think of cricket or a soccer field, indulge me here, for most it is likely baseball or sales. It is also likely that sales adopted the term from the sport.
If we look at baseball and see that the role of the pitcher is to get three balls past the batter without allowing the batter to connect and move forward to base. It is very much an adversarial situation, where the pitchers pitches of choice are the hard ball, fast ball, knuckle ball, the screw ball, or the ever favourite curve ball. Not terms you want to practice on your prospects, although many still do, we’re all familiar with the expression “hard sell”.
I am sure that when sales adopted the term pitch it wasn’t for the potentially negative connotations. More likely it was to describe tossing ideas to buyers as a means of finding common ground; done right and for certain transactional products it is a viable means of achieving a mutually beneficial deal between buyer and seller.
As the sale gets more involved, layered or complex, “the pitch” becomes less effective as a productive way to sell and achieve mutual value. Don’t get me wrong, every sale contains a pitch somewhere, but in the “solution” or “interactive” sale it is a much less significant part of success.
In fact I recently wrote about an experience I had with a rep as we were getting ready to sell to a group of ‘C’ level buyers (Have Your Say: To Pitch or To Sell). He was itching to pitch, but the situation called for a more interactive approach to discovering and understanding the buyer’s reality and mutually defining the value. While it is true that we had an idea of the potential solution based on past experience, going in and delivering a pitch would have fallen short and cost us the deal. We are now on the short list of three vendors, and were told that one reason was the patience we displayed with our questioning style versus some of the other providers who came in with a pitch
Taking the time to peel back the layers and understanding how the buyer sees and wants things; engaging in an exchange that allows for a transaction that delivers value to both partied. Now don’t get me wrong, I am not going soft in my old age, at one point you have to pitch your ideas, differentiate yourself from the competition, but that is a logical part of the process with a greater likelihood of success than if pitching was the whole process as it is with many sales organizations and individuals.


Hi Tibor
Good post, but I can’t agree with it all… for example, we Brits would not think of a soccer field, because we don’t play soccer, we play football and therefore we would think of a football field. I’m afraid it’s your southern cousins that have influenced our commonwealth friends in thinking football is soccer. They confuse things… as my 8 year old daughter recently asked me why American Football is called football when all they seem to do is throw the ball? Similarly, baseball is actually rounders… confused?
More seriously, I think you hit the nail on the head with linking ‘pitching’ to transactional selling and I think that is where it should stay. It may be just semantics but I would rather like to think that there is no pitching in the ’solution’ sell… presenting… discussing… exploring ideas… all seem to have a more positive connotation.
Colin,
I am sorry, you are right about the southern influence. I will start going to the local pub rather than the bar to try and rebalalnce.
Tibor
Could not agree more. It’s not about baseball per se, it’s about the use of a competitive metaphor in what should rightly be a collaborative venture.
In my experience, the language of “the pitch” is used in industries that are more transactional in nature, not as evolved at developing relationships, and generally used by the sample people who focus on “closing” (another baseball term, btw), hits (hmmm..) and “curve balls.” (OK so maybe it is about baseball).
Anyway: talking about “the pitch” carries with it subtle connotations of us vs. them. In almost all sales situations, this is not useful. What’s more useful are languages that reinforce client focus, collaboration, transparency, in it together, etc.
Great post Tibor! Too often, I see sales people all too ready to pitch, before they even know what the customer wants/needs. The drive to pitch, gets in the way of listening to the customer. Consquently, sales people miss the opportunity to engage the customer in a dialog–discussing and exploring ideas.
Thanks for the post, I enjoyed it. You may be interested in a similar post I wrote in January. Here’s the link: http://partnersinexcellence.blogspot.com/2009/01/stop-pitching-start-listening-to-your.html